Making Meetings Work: Plan With Purpose

November 4, 2025

Intentional Design vs. Going Through the Motions

Many leaders think that creating an agenda is “designing” a meeting. But intentional design is different. It’s about thinking through what people need, how outcomes will be achieved, and what structure will guide the group to progress. Done well, intentional design makes the difference between meetings that waste time and meetings that move the work (and attendees) forward.



Here are four ways to plan with purpose.

1. Start With Empathy

Most leaders begin by asking themselves, What do I want to say? What do I want to accomplish? That’s natural, but it’s also why so many meetings fall flat. The starting point should be: What does the group need from this meeting?



What do they need to hear? What are they emotionally or psychologically ready to take on? Where are they and what do they need? This is especially critical during times of change, which (let’s be honest) is basically all the time now . But it applies just as much in routine standups or one-on-ones. A meeting designed without empathy can feel rushed, irrelevant, or even unsafe. A meeting designed with empathy creates space for people to engage fully.

2. Clarify What Success Looks Like

The most common mistake leaders make when defining meeting outcomes is focusing only on what people should know by the time the meeting ends. Some go a step further and think about what people should do. But almost no one thinks about how they want people to feel. And here’s the inconvenient truth: how people feel at the end of a meeting will determine what happens next.

Without a clear idea of what you want people to know, feel, AND do, meetings are overstuffed with context, details, and noise. Again, it’s a list of topics, not an intentional, outcome-oriented discussion. A better approach is to set “Know, Feel, Do” objectives:


  • Know: the specific knowledge people should walk away with.
  • Feel: the emotional state you want to cultivate (confidence, urgency, ownership, inspiration).
  • Do: the action that should follow.


Before you send out the meeting invite, clarify your meeting’s Know/Feel/Do by finishing these three sentences:


  • At the end of the meeting, attendees will know…
  • At the end of the meeting, attendees will feel… 
  • At the end of the meeting, attendees will do…


By determining all three of these outcomes, you’ll design meetings that are focused, human-centered, and action-driven. Plus, if the meeting planning itself requires stakeholder buy-in, these statements  go a long way to getting real alignment. 

3. Sketch a Realistic Flow

Translating your outcomes into an agenda goes beyond putting together a list of activities or topics.

Take a brainstorming session as an example. If the true goal is to make a final decision, then you’re not just “generating ideas.” In reality, you need to:


  1. Generate options
  2. Agree on a prioritization framework
  3. Evaluate options against that framework
  4. Vote or align on the best choice
  5. Confirm buy-in and secure commitment


That’s a lot of steps. If you only have 30 minutes, you may need to narrow the scope: maybe end at idea generation and assign a team to develop the evaluation framework for next time. On the other hand, if you can realistically get through all those steps, you’re already well on your way to a crisp, productive meeting.


The key is to lay out every step. Start with where you want to end and work backwards to where the group actually is right now. Then allocate time thoughtfully, including room for transitions and questions. Better to design a process that fits than to overload and spill into “yet another follow-up meeting.”

4. Get Creative and Get Detailed

Once you have an overall flow for the time together, get creative with how you will spend the time to get to your outcomes. Too much time spent listening to a presentation will undercut all your thoughtfulness to this point.

For each step in your flow, consider:


  • How can I make this actually engaging?
  • If I can’t use a slide deck, how might I communicate this?
  • How can I structure the ways people will talk, write, and share?
  • Should we do this in partners or small groups before we align as a larger group?


Getting creative with the activities and design of each moment in your meeting will make sure that everyone is truly participating and getting on the same page, and not just watching you talk. The more you ask people to do something during a meeting, the more bought in they are to the follow-ups after.


Once you have your ideas, write out your detailed agenda. You want a document with a detailed play-by-play including timing, materials, and key outcomes for each segment of the agenda. Building one forces you to clarify each step and how you’ll lead the group through it. It makes you a cleaner, clearer leader.


For example, instead of improvising and rephrasing a question three different ways, you’ve already refined the wording. Instead of guessing at time management as you go, you’ve already set realistic allotments. If you’re crunched for time, even a simple guide with bullet points and time estimates helps you run a meeting with more confidence and focus. It’s a small investment that pays off in effectiveness.

From a Topic List to Real Outcomes

Although the meeting Stephanie was invited to looked organized at the outset, it wasn’t designed with intention. There were topics to discuss, but unclear desired outcomes. That’s the trap most leaders fall into, and an opportunity for you to stand out.

Plan with purpose.



For your next meeting, try to design your agenda “backwards.” Start with outcomes you want to achieve, and work your way backwards in the process until you get to where the group is now.

Four people seated at a table, one in purple is facing the group, the others are light-skinned and looking at him/her.


Making Meetings Work | A Practical Series for Team Leads and Managers


Most professionals spend hours each week in meetings, yet too many of those hours feel wasted. At Wolf & Heron, we believe meetings should create clarity, connection, and momentum—not frustration. This article is the first installment of a four-part series that gives team leads and managers the tools to design and facilitate meetings that actually create follow through.

Why “Organized” Meetings Still Fail

Share this article

Recent Posts

January 5, 2026
Recently, a product manager came to Kara looking for coaching on her storytelling skills and presentation delivery. When Kara asked what was behind the need, the client shared that she often has high-stakes moments with leadership where she needs to secure critical resources, like headcount. These conversations have serious implications for her team and her product’s success. She knows her data inside and out. The decision she wants to recommend to her executives feels clear to her. She’s prepared… but when she walks into the meeting, her data doesn’t land, and her arguments fall flat.  She knows this because leadership asks questions like: What does this number mean? How do you know? They aren’t seeing the context, the “so what,” or how her data fits into the bigger picture of the business.
December 15, 2025
Stephanie and Kara both learned early in our professional lives that follow-through matters. As students at Michigan Ross School of Business, it was drilled into us: after an interview, send a thoughtful thank-you note that references the conversation. It was presented as a way to stand out and be polite… a nice finishing touch to remember you by.  But although a thank you is polite, it doesn’t build momentum.
December 1, 2025
Early in our Wolf & Heron days, Stephanie facilitated our Influential Storytelling workshop for a major new client. It was a high-stakes moment: 100+ people in the room, a huge win for us, and her first time delivering the workshop solo. She opened with a story she had polished, rehearsed, and delivered successfully many times before.
November 17, 2025
Carissa came to Stephanie frustrated. She had a 15-minute slot with her executive leadership team, and she wanted to understand why her user-research findings weren’t influencing leadership action. She had spent months gathering insights, synthesizing trends, and surfacing recommendations, yet every time she presented them, leaders nodded politely and moved on. There was no change or follow through. 
Show More