The Invisible Weight of Leading Through Change
What to Notice
She wasn't crumbling under this because she was weak. She was feeling the full weight of it because she cared deeply about her team, her mission, and the people her work was meant to protect.
And amid all of it, she said something that has stayed with us: "I just don't want my team to feel like things are falling apart. Even though it kind of feels like they are."
Holding yourself together so others can feel held is not just a management challenge. It is the defining test of leadership in moments of change.
Signals Don’t Explain Themselves
The challenge is that none of these signals come with a clear explanation.
A change in participation could mean people need more time to think, or that they are unsure how to contribute. It could also mean they are not aligned with the direction of the conversation or do not see its relevance. Or, it could mean they’re thinking, “we get it, we’re ready, keep going.”
This is where many leaders get tripped up. They notice the change in participation (for example),, but they are not sure how to interpret it. They default to their first assumption or get anxious and charge ahead and hope it just “goes away.”
A few weeks ago, Stephanie got on a call with a client she's been coaching for several months. This client, a public health leader who had spent years building a program she believed in, was in tears.
The list of what she was navigating was almost hard to say out loud: federal funding for her department was evaporating. Public trust in the field she'd devoted her career to had cratered in the years since COVID. There was an active measles outbreak demanding her team's around-the-clock attention. The strategic plan she'd helped design was effectively on hold. And in the same week, both her boss and her most trusted employee had resigned, with a hiring freeze in place that meant no one would be coming to help.
When the change is relentless
Every organization navigates disruption. Reorganizations, budget shifts, leadership transitions — these are the normal rhythms of institutional life. Leaders have always been asked to adapt.
But there are seasons when the change is not just significant. It's relentless. It comes from multiple directions at once, with no clear end date and no clean narrative to give your team. Those moments are in a category of their own.
What makes them so hard is not just the external disruption. It's the experience of being a leader inside the disruption, responsible for steadying others while you yourself are being unsettled.
The dual weight
Mid-level leaders often have it the hardest during periods of significant change. They sit between the decisions being made above them and the people being affected below them. They carry information they can't always share. They're asked to communicate clarity when there isn't any, and to project confidence when they're quietly scared.
As we've worked with leaders across industries, from public health to tech to nonprofits, we've seen this dynamic play out again and again. The language that tends to come up, in some form or another, is: I am trying to support my people through something I'm also struggling with myself. Leadership in hard moments looks like this, whether or not anyone names it that.
McKinsey research shows that most large-scale transformation efforts fail, not because of poor strategy at the top, but because the people responsible for day-to-day leadership aren't equipped to guide others through the emotional and operational realities of change. The strategy may be sound. The implementation may be thoughtful. But if the people leading on the ground aren't supported, the change doesn't take hold where it needs to: in everyday conversations, in team meetings, in one-on-ones.
What people are actually looking for
When change is hard and the future feels uncertain, people don't primarily need answers. They need to feel that someone is steady. Present. Honest.
They want a leader who won't pretend things are fine when they're not, but who also won't catastrophize. Someone who acknowledges the difficulty without disappearing into it. Someone who, even in the absence of a clear path forward, gives them reason to believe the team will be okay.
The emotional complexity of leading through change is real. Leaders are often grieving lost certainty, shelved plans, departed colleagues, and capacity they no longer have, all while being asked to project stability. That combination is exhausting. And it can push leaders toward a false choice: be human, or be effective.
The leaders who show up best during significant change tend to be the ones who've rejected that binary. Their own emotional experience isn't separate from their leadership. It's part of how they connect with their teams.
Presence over answers
If you're leading a team through change right now, any kind, but especially the kind that feels unrelenting, the most important things you can bring are awareness and presence.
Awareness of what your team is carrying. Awareness of what you're carrying. Awareness of the gap between what's known and what isn't, and what that gap is doing to the people around you.
And presence: the willingness to show up honestly, even when you don't have all the answers. Especially then.
In our upcoming webinar on leading through change, we'll explore what it looks like to lead well when the ground is moving, and what it actually takes to support your team through uncertainty without losing yourself in the process.
If you're in the middle of it right now, this one's for you.
Recent Posts






